In 1637 Fermat proposed what is known as his last theorem where
an + bn = cn only works when n = 1 or 2
After 357, years in 1994 Andrew Wiles proved it and got a Nobel Gong.
In the addenda of my edition of ‘A brief history of time’ 1988, Hawking leaves us
the ‘mirror box puzzle’ petitioning us from time, to ghost-bust this spook.
This work proposes a Bi-verse solution
Bi-verse theory holds that the same energy that flows out from positive
charges and into negative charges returns to the positive charge, either thru some
amorphous subspace, like Brane theories’ predicted fourth dimension, or as I
predict thru a structured antiverse.
“Energy can neither be created nor destroyed; it always circulates.”
Particles or events in the ‘here-verse’ are their anti-particles or anti-events in the
antiverse.
Particles are zero point portals (or combinations of them) joined the inter-dimensional equator. Time is mutual.
An electron ‘here’ is a positron ‘there’ and vice versa. (A posilectron portal).
Coulomb energy spirals into, thru and out of a portal with the same angular
momentum.
Coulomb energy is inter-dimensionally entangled with it self.
In the Bi-verse
Energy will only circulate in the most efficient way.
Uninterrupted ‘here-verse’ energy goes to infinity.
At every instant it is returning from infinity via the antiverse along branches
which fork back to the trunk.
Some speculate back to the ‘singularity’.
Interrupted energy returns directly from the point of interruption.
It returns home in the most efficient way,”
Preferably thru the ‘here-verse’ dimensions when available.
Total Bi-verse coulomb vector energy is zero.
In the Biverse Mirror Box:
. All thru passages have an equal affect. T
. All reflections have another type of equal affect. R
In box 2
)))→SM1 } 50% photon waves → Block→antiphoton waves →SM1
…………… } 50% →SM2 } 25%→E→∞→Av→SM1
……………………………….. } 25%→N→∞→Av→SM1
In Box 3
. North-bound photons from SM2 prefer to circle back and head south via the neighboring photon’s pathway. They return at an opposite phase and cancel each other’s journey all the way back to SM1..
. The pathways have been affected the same obstacle paths—RRT = TRR.
From SM2 }→100% photons →E
They have different obstacle paths—RRR≠TRR at SM2
………Therefore } 50%→N→∞→Av=antiverse→SM1
. ……………………} 50%→E→∞→Av→SM1
Light will only interfere with light of the same polarization.
In Box 4
)))→ SM1→50%→N→E→D1.
Photon waves are detected at D1 which takes some data ‘∆’ from their wave function which ceases to be complete. Partially depolarised, it now cannot interfere with other photon wave functions at SM2.
From } D1→∆→ SM1
…………… }(Ph-∆)→SM2 } 50%→N→∞→Av→SM1
…………………………………. } 50%→E→∞→Av→SM1
……OR
)))→ SM1→50%→E→SM2 } 50% )))→N→∞←Av→SM1
………………………………………} 50% )))→E→∞←Av→SM1
NB. If photons passing thru the detector maintain their unadulterated wave function then at SM2 they would interfere like those in box 3 – viz 100% & 0%, which they don’t.